>Killin’ Katrina’s Journalists = Don’t Front: They’ve Done It In Iraq. (MUST WATCH SEGMENT…)

>

incidentally…

they’re not restoring the peace…

they’re hunting people for sport…

(…)

just thought you should know…

(…)

(MUST WATCH SEGMENT…)

SOURCE – http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/09/1411231

(…)

Democracy NOW!

Friday, September 9th, 2005

Is the Government Trying to Stem the Tide of Images From New Orleans by Threatening Journalists?

Listen to Segment || Download Show mp3
Watch 128k stream Watch 256k stream Read Transcript
Help Printer-friendly version Email to a friend Purchase Video/CD

Journalists covering New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina report that militarization in and around the city has hindered their work and threatened their physical safety. We hear from two journalists who were reporting in New Orleans recently. [includes rush transcript] The journalists who have been covering Hurricane Katrina have literally been risking their lives for the last week. Reporters have been stationed in and around New Orleans since the Hurricane hit and have tirelessly reported on the devastation to the city. Some journalists have expressed enormous outrage at government officials for their slow response. A few television reporters openly broke down on air as they report the horrific conditions and the desperation of victims. Reporters have witnessed the militarization of the city and are starting to feel the effects of the government crack-down on information gathering. FEMA is now rejecting requests by journalists to accompany rescue boats searching for storm victims. In addition, journalists are being asked not to photograph any dead bodies in the region. NBC News Anchor Brian Williams reported on his blog, that police officers had been seen aiming their weapons at members of the media. And a blogger named Bob Brigham wrote a widely read dispatch that the National Guard in Jefferson County are under orders to turn all journalists away. Brigham writes: “Bush is now censoring all reporting from New Orleans, Louisiana. The First Amendment sank with the city.”

Earlier this week, Reporters Without Borders issued a warning about police violence against journalists working in New Orleans. They highlighted two cases – in one case police detained a Times-Picayune photographer and smashed his equipment to the ground after he was seen covering a shoot-out with police. In the second case, a photographer from the Toronto Star was detained by police and his photos taken from him when police realized that he had snapped photos of a clash between them and citizens who the police claimed were looters.

* Tim Harper, reporter with the Toronto Star
* Jacquie Soohen, Independent film maker with Big Noise films. Among her films – “Zapitista” and “Fourth World War,” where she traversed the globe – from South Africa to South Korea, from Argentina to Iraq- documenting anti corporate globalization struggles.

(MUST WATCH SEGMENT…)

SOURCE – http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/09/1411231

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate – $25, $50, $100, more…

AMY GOODMAN: White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan was asked about the crackdown yesterday.

REPORTER: There are a couple of issues that are developing that are of concerns to journalists down in Louisiana and Mississippi. One of them is FEMA refusing to take reporters and photographers when they’re going to recover the bodies, ostensibly because they don’t want pictures of them on the news, but this also is at the same time as reporters are discovering that access is being barred to them to places — by the military to places where they previously went. Brian Williams’ own blog reports an instance of a police officer turning a gun on reporters.

SCOTT McCLELLAN: Sorry, I haven’t blogged today, so I haven’t seen some of those reports.

REPORTER: Check it out. He has three instances in there of the military being hostile to journalists.

SCOTT McCLELLAN: I know that the military and I think even Coast Guard has taken steps to try to make sure reporters can go along on some of the efforts that — the humanitarian assistance efforts and search and rescue efforts. That was my understanding when we were there on Friday, visiting with a lot of the Coast Guard people that had been working around the clock on search and rescue operations.

Your first statement that you made, I think you need to look further into that, because I don’t think that’s an accurate characterization. I saw some reports to that effect, and my understanding is it was not an accurate characterization. Certainly, I think we all want to keep in mind the sensitivities that will arise when we begin more or larger undertaking of recovering bodies that will be found. As I said, it’s going to be an ugly situation when those floodwaters ultimately recede and we go in and start recovering larger numbers of bodies of people who have lost their lives. Those are people who had families and friends, and we hope everybody will show the dignity and proper dignity and respect, but in terms of the characterization that you made, I don’t think that’s accurate.

REPORTER: We have a quote from FEMA about it, saying “the recovery of victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect, and we have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media.” And yet, the bodies themselves, tragically, are a very large part of the story, and to bar any visual depiction of it —

SCOTT McCLELLAN: I’m not sure that that’s the full statement.

(MUST WATCH SEGMENT…)

SOURCE – http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/09/1411231

AMY GOODMAN: That was White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan speaking on Thursday, being questioned by reporters at the White House. Joining us in our D.C. studio is Tim Harper, a reporter with the Toronto Star. He was with his photographer, Lucas Oleniuk, the photographer from the Toronto Star whose photos were taken from him by police. And here with us in New York is Jacquie Soohen. She just flew in last night, an independent filmmaker with Big Noise Films. And we’ll talk with her about what happened to her in a minute, but first we go to Tim Harper in Washington. Explain when you were in New Orleans with your photographer and what happened.

TIM HARPER: Sure. It was a week ago Thursday. It was a day that things were quite clearly out of control. It was before any federal troops had come in to try to take control of the situation. New Orleans authorities were clearly way over their head at that point, and looting had been breaking out over the past 24 hours everywhere.

We drove, Lucas Oleniuk and I drove into the city. We were a couple of blocks away from the Convention Center, when he noticed on the left what looked to be perhaps the start of a shootout. We noticed a New Orleans ETF, emergency task force officer crouching behind his car with his gun drawn. Lucas jumped out of the car. As soon as he did, we heard a quick pop, pop, pop, and gunfire was coming from an apartment block, and being returned by the police.

I was told in no uncertain terms at gunpoint to get the hell out of the area, and I complied as best I could. But Lucas was caught essentially in the gunfire because New Orleans police pulled up behind him and started shooting over his shoulder. So during the 15-minute or so standoff that ensued, he was taking pictures alongside New Orleans officers as they were caught in the standoff. Now, subsequently, they did get two suspects out of the apartment block where this incident was happening, and while Lucas was shooting, they administered a rather fierce beating on these two guys. And I guess that was the problem.

As soon as they realized that the beating of the suspects was being captured on film, one officer tried to rip the camera off his shoulder. His press tag was ripped off. Eventually, they got one camera and started messing with the camera trying to get the pictures out. Fearful that they were going to ruin his camera, he showed them how to get the images out. His second camera was ripped from his shoulder at that time, and when he asked whether he could get his images back, he was threatened with having his neck broken, had guns pointed at him.

I came back to try to help him. I had guns pointed at me. I was told to turn my car around, stop or I’ll shoot. I had a shotgun pointed at the windshield. So the bottom line is about 350 images that Lucas Oleniuk took will never be seen, and I thought almost equally as important, ripping off his press tag at that point and leaving him out any press accreditation driving around in the city in that situation made him incredibly vulnerable. It was a very dangerous situation.

JUAN GONZALEZ: So, in other words, they did not initially try to stop his shooting of photographs of the shootout. It was only when —

TIM HARPER: Not during the shootout, no.

AMY GOODMAN: — they started to beat the prisoners that they had grabbed that they became concerned?

TIM HARPER: Yeah. No, it’s not clear at that point whether they allowed him to keep taking the pictures, because obviously, they were worried about sniper fire coming from the apartment, and they didn’t want to do anything to endanger themselves. But there was — nobody tried to intervene. He actually at one point ran across the street from — he had taken shelter behind a light standard, and then while the shooting was going on, ran across about a quarter block length to get behind a cruiser for better protection, beside another officer shooting, so, no, there was no move to stop him from taking pictures while they were involved in the shootout.

AMY GOODMAN: Tim Harper is a reporter with the Toronto Star. His photographer, Lucas Oleniuk with the Toronto Star had his film taken. When we come back, we’ll also be joined by Jacquie Soohen to talk about her experience as she was filming, as well.

(MUST WATCH SEGMENT…)

SOURCE – http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/09/1411231

>Karl Killin’ Katrina = "Hey, Joe Normal: Do You Believe in Seatbelts?"

>

Hey Man,

While I try to keep it low-key to encourage dialogue and learn how y’all think, and sometimes it’s better to have pure “control” groups for the social analysis I’m doing, I often look at you guys with the exasperation of a parent telling his teenager to wear a seatbelt: I can explain the history of cars, the speed of cars, the physics behind their potential weight and destructive power, the danger of other drivers, the various car-accident statistics…

…and what I get back is: “DAD!!! I’m in a BIG METAL BOX! How can I possibly get hurt? DUH!!!”

(sigh)

So, in an effort to save the world I figure I’ll launch a tonne of these salvos, because frankly I ain’t crazy: I’m a happy camper because I don’t let “The Man” drive me crazy, and I kick it with too many who do.

The world I live in makes a lot more sense than the aggressively sold anecdotal half-knowledge I’ve heard tersely repeated through pursed-lips and furrowed brows. It’s like people trade whatever “headlines” they happened to catch, and a “denial” of the value of their statements even to helpfully correct them is “insulting” to their intelligence. This is where we are all turning into Karl Rovebots: the genius of his strategy is we have to indulge every lie, malicious or otherwise, as long as one can cite mainstream media proof.

I’ve realized that I can’t beat “facts”, they’re too bloody personal when it comes to politics, and people get too shook when they’re world view is proven to be a series of lies – which it inevitably is, and in candid moments you know journalists will freely admit the inherent corruption in their organizations.

It’s gonna get worse: with our focus increasingly being trained away from local issues and onto national or global ones, we’re all just gonna be herded into buying bigger lies. When you know your local issues, you can see for yourself the practical impact of choices made on a smaller, personal and community scale. Unfortunately the U.S. biggest export is “culture”, and if they’re getting more Fascist, then we will too…

(I mean it too, look up the definition and map it to what you know is happening… it’s scary.)

So “facts” I mostly leave alone, but I can consistently beat the crappy “logic” used to support facts served as a thin-gruel by the media, it has a similar effect, but new logic is better as an empowering “tool” people can use themselves going forward.

All both “they” and “we” need is that one big headline a day man, just that one huge “fix” for all of us to get high.

The mighty and influential U.S. Govt needs every news organization in the world to say their “message” just “once” and exactly as they want it printed or shown, and with the most neutral “unbiased” analysis bereft of any “context” that could be taken out of context.

And it should certainly be reported: it’s a “story”.

However, even if half of the same news organizations say it was wrong, in a fast-paced world where only a fraction may catch a quiet correction late in the news or in the back of the paper… that just sets up the next round of shallow debate.

You just have to believe me: The Man’s been trying forever to screw us.

Just ask all of your favorite artists, writers, musicians… and please, give them the benefit of the doubt.

I mean, c’mon.

I was at a Billy Idol concert the other nite (a friend had free tix – and he’s bananas, an awesome performer, I had no idea), and something struck me yet again when he said at the end of his show in his crazy-cracker-cockney accent: “Remember, watch your brothers back, and don’t worry, we’re gonna win!”

These people make us too bloody happy to disrespect them by not listening to them, and for the life of me as an artist myself, I can’t imagine why they would say the stuff they do unless they believed it – nor why they’d believe it unless they did some homework. For me personally, it would represent a disgusting lack of self-respect and respect for my audience to lie in my art…

They’re also a hell of a lot smarter than we’re taught to give them credit for, and that’s what I’m trying to prove by writing this down: you can say it well or you can say it loudly, if you do both they’ll kill you. So, I’m saying it historically well right here and right now, and soon I’ve just gotta go make history with it…

Kanye’s got a new lyric saying: “Who gave Saddam anthrax?/George Bush got the answers.” I don’t think he’s only referring to what he’s saying: I think he’s alluding to the fact that the U.S. Govt. admitted the anthrax “fingerprint” proved that what was sent to the people calling for an investigation right after 9/11/ had to come from Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Not Osama in a cave. Not Saddam in a palace.

He’s just planting the seeds that’ll grow son, you can even cultivate your own bonzai tree.

Roughly half the time these “conspiracy theorists” use the U.S. Govt’s own admissions of guilt that most “media” just won’t print because it’s an “old story” (or they’re evil corporate shills… take your pick). Documents are declassified (The Northwoods Papers), people are caught and testify under oath (CIA drug-running cases), and their ongoing admissions alone (black helicopters and Gulfstreams are STILL disappearing people TODAY – they never said they would stop) make parallel “conspiracy” theories so damned logical that disbelief in their possibility is undeniably insane.

Our old friends at Google can still find all the “mainstream” sources you want (for now – in tracking them for a year they’re “disappearing” too), so just add a few words together and “Stir It Up…”

1. Artists have to hit “truth” to make a lasting impact, otherwise their stuff sucks. Some get away with it, but on balance it is far easier for an “expert” to run circles around Joe Average than for an artist to. We’ve got better natural instincts for judging their work, and unlike “experts” and the rise of “think tanks” for whom the inverse is undeniably true: the more honest an artist is with themselves, their fans and their work, the better their chances of having a long and productive and lucrative career and respect from their peers. It’s a much more democractic process: WE pull the puppet strings that make them dance, WE decide if they suck or not, unlike “experts” who we are told to grovel in front of.

2. The history of U.S. Govt. evil is so easy for us to digest that when we see it in movies and TV shows we can follow along gaily with a complete understanding of it’s possibility: it’s never shocking, it’s merely acceptable “context” for a “story” they wanna tell. I’ve seen a hell of a lot more stuff than you have over the last year, so history ain’t no mystery, but any adult in the world can casually cite their own list: supporting multiple dictatorships, genocides, spy games, illegal wars, the biggest prison population in the world, the war on drugs… this ain’t the time for “disbelief”, that’s crazy talk: this is just another one of those times.

3. The defiant arrogance of the mass-media is denying the democractic certification of independent media: we’re talking about “millions” of people cross-referencing sources and trading analysis. The marginalized definitions used are not authoritative, they are deliberately disrespectful: don’t buy the lies. Sure, you can call it “The Year of the Blogger”, but when you never write another story about blogs again then you’re full of crap – or when you “hardly” do, then how can they be so important as to warrant the term: “Year of the Blogger”? It’s just like TIME Magazine calling Noam Chomsky “The Most Important Intellectual of our Time”… and then losing his phone number. When it comes to the media, words speak louder than actions, and if you look closer: they often don’t match.

4. We believe all sorts of crap on the “innernet!”, except when it comes to politics: what happened to “crooked politicians” as a “rule” and not an “exception”? Today it’s no longer just one crazy nut poring through thousands of pages of official government documents (actually… thanks a lot man!!!), it’s hundreds of them, and thousands of fact-checkers posting the originals as .pdf’s and .jpeg’s among others – I’ve seen a bunch, including a wicked set of GOP Talking Points on RAW Story explaining how to discredit Joe Wilson and defend Karl Rove. The logic used to dismiss these people is asinine: who would do it for what reason? Who would fight through the “crazy” stereotype because they feel they have to? These aren’t snake-oil salesmen or TV psychics, and they’re certainly not landing huge book and TV deals by speaking the “truth” for it’s own sake. In fact, they could just pull back and push an “official” story to rake in the big bucks – even Bob “Watergate” Woodward sold out right after that, and don’t think I’m not considering it: convo’s like this I just can’t keep up forever…

…and I dare you to imagine a world where we all gave up.

Peace,
BK

_________________

…

Black Krishna Brand

Philosophy – http://blackkrishna.blogspot.com/

Music – http://www.soundclick.com/bands/0/blackkrishna.htm

…

BONUS: Download this awesome Billy Idol song from back in the day…

“Sweet Sixteen”

(…)

ENDNOTE: Sometimes I feel like I’m walking around and everyone’s now missing an arm:

BK: “Ahh!!! Dude, you’re missing an arm!”

Dude: “No I’m not.”

BK: “Oh crap.”